Series: ‘A Note to Parents’ - Focus on the Fit

Tyler Kreitz • September 8, 2021

In this series of posts, published by our CEO Tyler Kreitz when he was the COO of ADVNC Lacrosse, Tyler sheds light on pressing issues facing families in youth sports. Not only does Tyler provide valuable insight on these issues from top researchers in the space, but also tangible solutions to instill positive change in the youth sports ecosystem coming out of the COVID-19 pandemic.

10/24/19

Dear Parents, 

Over the past few weeks, six ADVNC and Seattle Starz players (and counting) have announced their commitments to top tier NCAA Division I lacrosse programs. Aside from these kids achieving their goal of reaching the pinnacle of the sport, the universities themselves (Cornell, Princeton, Brown, Notre Dame, North Carolina, and Michigan) read like a dream for any parent who wants to put their kid’s college sticker on the back of their car. These college commitments are incredible achievements for these players and as a program, we could not be prouder. Each of these kids earned this reward after years of hard work both on the field and off. 

Around the same time these commit announcements came out, I noticed that US News and World Report announced their 2020 list of top Global Universities , which has taken the oft-derided ranking of colleges to a global scale. The validity of these rankings is subjective and their methodology, the values, and what they actually measure have been dissected and laid to bare by some very smart people (Gladwell, always Gladwell). All that said, and all hand wringing aside, these lists do matter as they graft onto our aspirations for our kids and our pride in where we went to school. It’s easy to deride them for what they are, but it’s hard to say that they don’t have an effect.  

These lists contribute to the increased pressure that kids and parents are feeling around college and the college search process by consistently ranking the same 40 to 50 at the top. They also ignore the value of personal fit for each student, let alone the notion that where you go to school does not make you who you are .  

We also unintentionally contribute to this pressure cooker. At ADVNC, we work with many kids who’s desire to play high-level DI lacrosse means aiming for the schools on the top of these rankings. A part of helping kids get the exposure they need to play NCAA DI lacrosse in college is celebrating those who have achieved this in our program. It draws more attention to our teams, which in turn helps other kids gain opportunities. Yet it also turns up the pressure cooker by consistently emphasizing this small group of schools.  We’re torn with this duality, as are many organizations like ours. How do we deflate this pressure cooker while we’re inherently contributing to it? 

As a lacrosse focused company, we feel there are easy steps we can take. The first is to reemphasize the focus on colleges that fit the ‘40 year plan’ of a player as opposed to the ‘4-year plan’. By the ‘40-year plan,’ we mean putting the emphasis on colleges that fit with the student on a holistic level and not only on an athletic one. This is easier in lacrosse than in other sports as lacrosse is not as soaked with money and ripe for corruption. For instance, the shoe companies and the industries that so heavily influence (and corrupt) AAU basketball don’t exist in lacrosse. Nor do huge professional leagues, with their incredible financial rewards. This allows the focus to remain on colleges that fit the players’ educational and life goals and lets lacrosse play its role in helping open doors into education opportunities. 

By establishing the ‘40-year plan’ as the focus, college fit becomes the natural goal. Our partners at Athens Advisors put this at the center of their advising process as studies of student outcomes, both anecdotal and rigorous, show that school ‘fit’ matters much more than rank. A focus on college fit alone would deflate much of the pressure that families and students feel. Even by the stricter standards of eligibility into the U.S. News rankings, there are around 1,400 regionally accredited colleges and universities offering four-year undergraduate degree programs. For families who are part of ADVNC, however, the number of colleges offering a good ‘fit’ and lacrosse is still considerable. 

At first glance, this may seem counter-intuitive. There are still only 71 NCAA Division I lacrosse programs. Adding in Division II and there are 61 more. Division III adds 236, for a total of 405 schools offering NCAA men’s lacrosse. Most of these schools are on the Eastern seaboard and for lacrosse-playing student-athletes who want a larger, more raucous collegiate experience the NCAA options are limited. And forget it if you want to stay in California or the west coast. 

However, with the onset and growth of the Men's Collegiate Lacrosse Association (MCLA), the options to play lacrosse in college, and find a college that fits, grow considerably. 299 schools across the country have teams that participate in the MCLA. These schools range in size and type and cover a broad geographic range that NCAA lacrosse doesn’t cover. Debating the merits of MCLA vs. NCAA lacrosse is ridiculous in our opinion, they are different, but the end result of what they contribute - an opportunity to play competitive lacrosse at a college that fits your 40-year plan- remains. 

In partnering with ConnectLax and utilizing their easy to use college search tool , we’re able to help kids and families find the schools that provide an initial fit. This takes a step in the right direction to where families and players should focus. The next step is to break down the process of getting to those colleges that fit and framing the process as the goal. 

In speaking with Dr. Peggy Hock, a 25 year veteran of the college admissions process and former president of the Western Association for College Admissions Counseling (WACAC), about these ideas she advised there still is no ‘Golden Ticket’ process that will guarantee admission to any university. It just doesn’t work that way. Libraries could be filled and college courses taught on dissecting the admissions process at universities. It is a world filled with variables that a student and family simply cannot control. 

What can be controlled is how one navigates and approaches the process and the variables they can control. When I have worked with kids and families on this, I frame the process as a climb up a mountain. As with any climb the reward at the top of the mountain is the view. In this case, the higher you go the greater the view of the schools that fit the profile of the student and their 40-year plan. To get to this view it takes skill, dedication, and if you're an aspiring athlete - a bit of genetic luck. Yet there is a path to follow, much like there are trails to follow to the summit of a peak. As you follow the path and focus on controlling what you can, i.e. academic effort, working hard in practice, being a good teammate, each successive step reveals a greater view from where you were before. The goal becomes the process, and following the path to being a good student-athlete ends up opening more education opportunities. 

This is not in any way perfect advice, nor the prescription for getting into your dream school. It is, however, an approach that addresses the real issue we’re trying to confront - the pressure cooker environment of college admissions in youth sports. We will continue to advocate for all of our families and celebrate their college commitments when they occur, just as much as we celebrate and encourage each player to pursue their ‘40 year’ goal. While we’re doing this, we hope to see the pendulum on college choice and admissions swing back, away from the rankings and towards the student. 

It seems like the best path to take.

Until next time- 

Tyler

By Annie Gavett September 15, 2025
Focus On The Field Announces Strategic Partnership with Club Capital to Support Youth and Amateur Sports Organizations
By Tyler Kreitz August 25, 2025
As the world of youth sports changes dramatically, it helps to look for wisdom in unexpected places. Sometimes the clearest lessons come not from another coach or league director, but from a completely different field—like medicine. That connection became real for me through a chance introduction to Dr. Sanat Dixit , a neurosurgeon working on Sideline Ortho, a venture aimed at solving the long-standing problem of adequate medical coverage in youth and amateur sports. Our conversations quickly moved beyond medicine into broader discussions about sports, health, and problem solving. It was through Dr. Dixit that I was introduced to The Doctor’s Lounge podcast, where physicians candidly discuss the forces reshaping their profession. Listening to one particular episode, I couldn’t help but notice parallels between healthcare and youth sports—two worlds that couldn’t be more different in stakes, yet share a strikingly similar challenge: how consolidation and misaligned incentives can quietly undermine the very mission they are meant to serve. At Focus On The Field, we talk a lot about mission drift. In our corner of the world—youth sports—the mission is simple: kids on the field, playing with a caring coach by their side. In healthcare, the mission is just as simple: patients cared for by doctors who know them, trust them, and want to heal. But when consolidation takes hold—when hospital systems or league operators start to swallow up smaller players—the incentives shift. And when incentives drift away from care or play, the people who matter most pay the price: patients in the doctor’s office, kids on the field. Two Different Worlds, One Similar Problem Let’s be clear. Healthcare decisions are matters of life and death. Youth sports, as much as we love them, are not. A missed diagnosis is not the same as a missed ground ball. But there’s a parallel worth noticing, because it helps us understand why so many families and communities feel squeezed. In healthcare, large systems often prioritize billing, efficiency, and market share over the relationship between doctor and patient. The Doctor’s Lounge podcast recently highlighted how these forces erode trust and quality of care. The incentives reward throughput, not connection. In youth sports, private equity and national operators are consolidating leagues and teams. The result is a system that increasingly rewards revenue growth—higher registration fees, expanded travel schedules, premium “elite” programs—over what kids actually need: fun, development, and affordable access. The effect in both cases is misalignment. The goals of the enterprise no longer line up with the goals of the people it exists to serve. What Misalignment Looks Like on the Field We see it every season: Skyrocketing costs —average families spending over $1,000 per child on a single sport. Overemphasis on travel and specialization —kids in hotel ballrooms more than neighborhood parks. Barriers to entry —whole communities priced out of participation, when sports should be a universal language of play. Just as patients feel like numbers in a system, kids and families are being treated like customers in a marketplace, rather than participants in a community. What Alignment Could Look Like Here’s the good news: unlike healthcare, where the regulatory fixes are complex and slow, youth sports leaders have the chance to reset incentives now. At Focus On The Field, we believe alignment starts with four commitments: Local First. Build schedules that keep kids in their communities. Travel should be a choice, not a requirement. Transparent Pricing. Families deserve to know the all-in cost before the season begins. Access for All. As organizations grow, so should scholarship funds and community access. Scale should expand inclusion, not narrow it. Development over Specialization. Leagues should design seasons that give kids breaks, encourage multiple sports, and put long-term health ahead of short-term trophies. These aren’t anti-growth. They’re pro-mission. Just as healthcare reformers push for “site-neutral” payments to level incentives, youth sports can adopt “play-neutral” standards—where the real measure of success is participation, not profit. The Call to Coaches, Directors, Parents — and Investors The parallel with healthcare reminds us of what’s at stake. No, youth sports aren’t life and death. But for millions of kids, they’re the difference between belonging and isolation, between health and inactivity, between joy and pressure. That matters. If consolidation and professionalization are inevitable, then accountability must be too. Growth can’t come at the cost of play. Every new dollar of investment, every acquisition, every expansion should be judged by a simple test: Does this get more kids on the field, with a caring coach by their side? And this is where investors—especially those entering through private equity—hold the keys. Their capital can either accelerate the misalignment, squeezing families and narrowing access, or it can fuel a positive alignment that strengthens the very things money can’t measure: community, belonging, mentorship, and joy.  If investors understand those community-binding incentives correctly, their involvement could unlock real progress—scaling opportunity without sacrificing mission. Because the ultimate return on investment in youth sports isn’t measured on a balance sheet. It’s measured in kids who stay active, stay connected, and stay in the game.
By Tyler Kreitz August 4, 2025
Save sports through spreadsheets...
By Tyler Kreitz July 26, 2025
There's much to learn from the early days of public education.
By Annie Gavett May 12, 2025
Rodrigo Gomes (Bossa Sports Group/Volleyball Brands) and Focus on the Field Announce Strategic Partnership to Transform Youth Sports Organizations
By Tyler Kreitz April 7, 2025
I started this last week, all chipper about spring cleaning and hitting reset before summer madness. Then the economic world got chucked into a blender.
By Tyler Kreitz March 13, 2025
Somewhere in the shadowy margins of a suburban sports complex, a beleaguered youth sports director is drowning in spreadsheets, unanswered emails, and the ceaseless bickering of parents who want their kid to play attack but don’t know what offsides means.
By Annie Gavett January 7, 2025
The number one question I get about 5 times a week - which software system should I use? And my answer is always….it depends. I know it's frustrating, but there are MANY factors that should be considered when choosing a software system.
By Tyler Kreitz December 18, 2024
Are we contributing to the stress? Are we just spurring on the professionalization of youth activities? Are we part of the solution or just continuing the problem.  For anyone involved in youth sports it’s a question you must keep asking, especially as you reflect on the state of youth sports and your role within it.
By Annie Gavett December 16, 2024
Most people don’t become the President of a youth sports organization by choice. It’s not because they don’t want to help out, but it’s often thrust upon them in a moment of need. With the decline of volunteerism in this country, the true volunteers are often being asked to do part-time if not full-time jobs, but for no pay and with very little resources.  So what do you do if you find yourself in this situation? 
Show More